Brand
- A-DATA 4
- ACER 2
- AFOX 1
- APACER 6
- ASUS 2
- CODEGEN 7
- CORSAIR 4
- CRUCIAL 2
- DAHUA 8
- H3C 4
- HI-LEVEL 10
- HIKVISION 6
HPHP 2
- HUAWEI 1
- INTENSO 11
- KINGSTON 28
- KINGSTON_KAPALI_MARKA 1
- Kioxia 15
- LENOVO 1
- LEXAR 11
- MLD 1
- MSI 10
- MUSHKIN 4
- NETAC 1
- PATRIOT 2
SamsungSamsung 32
- SANDISK 7
- SEAGATE 36
- SYNOLOGY 7
- TEAM 5
- TOSHIBA 37
- TWINMOS 16
- WD 57
- Western Digital 2
- XPG 2
SAMSUNG 2TB T5 EVO MU-PH2T0S/WW USB 3.2 SSD HARİCİ DİSK
SAMSUNG 2TB T7 MU-PC2T0H/WW USB 3.0 SSD HARİCİ DİSK MAVİ
SAMSUNG 2TB T7 MU-PE2T0R/WW USB 3.0 SSD HARİCİ DİSK MAVİ
SAMSUNG 2TB T7 SHIELD MU-PC2T0T/WW USB 3.2 HARİCİ SSD DİSK SİYAH
SAMSUNG 2TB T7 SHIELD MU-PE2T0S/WW USB 3.2 SSD HARİCİ DİSK SİYAH
SAMSUNG 2TB TAŞINABİLİR T7 MU-PE2T0K/WW USB 3.0 SSD HARİCİ DİSK
SAMSUNG 4TB 870 EVO MZ-77E4T0BW 560-530MB/s SATA-3 SSD DİSK
SAMSUNG 4TB 870 QVO MZ-77Q4T0BW 560-530MB/s SATA-3 SSD DİSK
SAMSUNG 4TB 990 EVO PLUS MZ-V9S4T0BW 7250-6300MB/s M2 NVME GEN4 DİSK
SAMSUNG 4TB 990 PRO MZ-V9P4T0BW 7450-6900MB/s M2 NVME GEN4 DİSK
SAMSUNG 4TB 990 PRO MZ-V9P4T0CW 7450-6900MB/s M2 NVME GEN4 DİSK SOĞUTUCULU
SAMSUNG 4TB T5 EVO MU-PH4T0S/WW USB 3.2 SSD HARİCİ DİSK
SAMSUNG 4TB T7 SHIELD MU-PE4T0S/WW USB 3.2 SSD HARİCİ DİSK SİYAH
SAMSUNG 4TB T9 MU-PG4T0B/WW SSD USB 3.2 HARİCİ DİSK SİYAH
SAMSUNG 500GB 870 EVO MZ-77E500BW 560- 530MB/s SSD SATA-3 Disk
SAMSUNG 500GB SSD980 MZ-V8V500BW 3100- 2600MB/s M2 PCIe NVMe Gen3 Disk
SANDISK 1TB SSD Plus SDSSDA-1T00-G27 530- 350MB/s SSD SATA-3 Disk
SANDISK 240GB SDSSDA-240G-G26 530- 440MB/s SSD SATA-3
SANDISK 2TB EXTREME SDSSDE61-2T00-G25 SSD USB 3.2 HARİCİ DİSK SİYAH
SANDISK 2TB EXTREME SDSSDE61-2T00-G25B SSD USB 3.2 HARİCİ DİSK MAVİ
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.