XPG 48GB (2X 24GB) DDR5 6400MHZ CL32 RGB DUAL KIT PC RAM LANCER BLADE BEYAZ AX5U6400C3224G-DTLABRWH
XPG 64GB (2X 32GB) DDR5 6000MHZ CL30 DUAL KIT RGB PC RAM LANCER AX5U6000C3032G-DCLARBK
XPG 64GB (2X 32GB) DDR5 6000MHZ CL30 RGB DUAL KIT PC RAM LANCER BEYAZ AX5U6000C3032G-DCLARWH
XPG 64GB (2X 32GB) DDR5 6400MHZ CL32 RGB DUAL KIT PC RAM LANCER AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARBK
XPG 64GB (2X 32GB) DDR5 6400MHZ CL32 RGB DUAL KIT PC RAM LANCER BEYAZ AX5U6400C3232G-DCLARWH
XPG 8 GB DDR4 3600MHZ CL18 PC RAM GAMMIX D30 AX4U36008G18I-SR30
XPG 8GB DDR4 3200MHZ CL16 PC RAM GAMMIX D35 AX4U32008G16A-SBKD35
XPG 8GB DDR4 3200MHZ CL16 PC RAM GAMMIX-D30 AX4U32008G16A-SR30
XPG 8GB DDR4 3200MHZ CL16 RGB PC RAM SPECTRIX D35G AX4U32008G16A-SBKD35G
XPG 8GB DDR4 3600MHZ CL18 PC RAM GAMMIX D35 AX4U36008G18I-SBKD35
XPG 8GB DDR4 3600MHZ CL18 RGB PC RAM SPECTRIX D35G AX4U36008G18I-SBKD35G
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.