Brand
- A-DATA 4
- ACER 2
- AFOX 1
- APACER 6
- ASUS 2
- CODEGEN 7
- CORSAIR 4
- CRUCIAL 2
- DAHUA 8
- H3C 4
- HI-LEVEL 10
- HIKVISION 6
HPHP 2
- HUAWEI 1
- INTENSO 11
- KINGSTON 28
- KINGSTON_KAPALI_MARKA 1
- Kioxia 15
- LENOVO 1
- LEXAR 11
- MLD 1
- MSI 10
- MUSHKIN 4
- NETAC 1
- PATRIOT 2
SamsungSamsung 32
- SANDISK 7
- SEAGATE 36
- SYNOLOGY 7
- TEAM 5
- TOSHIBA 37
- TWINMOS 16
- WD 57
- Western Digital 2
- XPG 2
WD 8TB SN850X WDS800T2X0E 7200-6600MB/s M2 NVME GEN4 DİSK
WD 8TB ULTRASTAR DC HC320 256MB 7200RPM ENTERPRISE NAS VE GÜVENLİK SATA-3 DİSK
XPG 1TB ASX8200PNP-1TT-C 3500-3000MB/s M2 NVME GEN4 DİSK
XPG 1TB GAMMIX S70 BLADE AGAMMIXS70B-1T-CS 7400-5500MB/s M2 PCIE GEN4 DİSK
XPG 2TB GAMMIX S70 BLADE AGAMMIXS70B-2T-CS 7400-5500MB/s M2 PCIE GEN4 DİSK
XPG 512GB GAMMIX S11 PRO AGAMMIXS11P-512GT-C 3500-2300MB/s M2 NVME GEN3 DİSK
Online store of household appliances and electronics
Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.
A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.